Customers
CASES · 04 · RECONCILED TO CAPTUREPROOF, POURED DAILY.
Four builders, four different problems, one record. Every figure on this page is reconciled against captured site data — orthomosaics, 360 walks, autonomous missions — and against the RFIs, change orders, and claims the work actually ran on. Nothing here is a rendering.
Builders on the platform
ZERO PROGRESS DISPUTES ACROSS 41 TOWERS.
Meridian was losing about three weeks a quarter to arguments over what had actually been installed. Two 360 walks a week now cover every floor of every tower, auto-pinned to the plan, and Progress AI reads installed work off the frames — 82 trades, no BIM model required.
The monthly claim is assembled from the same record the superintendent walks. When a subcontractor disputes a line, the answer is a timestamped frame rather than a meeting. $18M of contested claims were settled straight from the visual record in the first year, and the dispute log has been empty for six months.
“We stopped arguing about percentages. The walk is the claim.”
- Verified installed
- Contract scope
41
Towers on the record
82
Trades verified from capture
$18M
Contested claims settled
34 KILOMETRES, RECONCILED EVERY NIGHT.
Halcyon docked six drones along the alignment and put them on a six-hour cycle. Nobody drives the corridor to fly it — the missions run themselves, upload on landing, and finish processing before the night shift ends.
Earthworks quantities are cut against the design surface every night, so the morning huddle opens on yesterday's real cut and fill instead of last month's estimate. Haul was rebalanced twice mid-job on that number. The corridor handed over 11% under budget.
“The quantity argument used to take a fortnight. It now takes a coffee.”
Running on
- Surveyed surface
- Design datum
- Cut / fill volume
34 km
Corridor under continuous capture
6 h
Between autonomous dock flights
11%
Under budget at handover
THREE TIMES THE BIDS. THE SAME ESTIMATING DESK.
Ironline's four estimators were reading tender packages by hand: 900 pages, four days, and the risk sat wherever they stopped reading. Bid Intelligence now ingests the whole package overnight and returns flagged clauses cited to the page, a trade-split bundle ready to send out, and a first-pass estimate priced off Ironline's own cost history.
Volume went up 3.1× without a hire. On one data-centre fit-out the brain surfaced a liquidated-damages clause buried in an appendix that would have taken the job's margin with it; Ironline priced the risk in and still won the work.
“It reads the appendix. That is the whole story.”
Running on
- Since Bid Intelligence
- Earlier quarters
- Baseline index 100
3.1×
Bid volume, year on year
214
Tenders read, last 12 months
56 h
Saved per PM per month
SIXTY JOBS, BRIEFED TO THE BOARD.
Northgate does not swing hammers; it carries the capital. Sixty active jobs across nine markets used to reach the board as sixty differently formatted PDFs, each of them a month old by the time anyone read one.
The Brain now assembles a single board pack from the live record: capital exposure by job, schedule risk ranked, and every figure cited to the capture frame, drawing revision, or change order it came from. Assembly takes eighteen minutes, and the questions in the room have moved from the numbers to the decisions.
“Every number in the pack has a source I can open. That changed the meeting.”
- High exposure
- Watch
- Nominal
60
Active jobs in one brief
100%
Board figures cited to source
18 min
To assemble the board pack
Across the platform
THE RECORD, IN AGGREGATE.
Four builds is the readable version. The dataset underneath them is the largest visual record of construction anywhere, and every project on it makes the next estimate, the next claim, and the next hazard call more exact.
2.4M
Projects built on the platform
21T
Sq ft of visual site data
175
Countries with active sites
$1.3T
Of construction managed
Every customer keeps their own model and their own weights — nothing on this page trained anything on anyone else’s job. See how the platform connects.